step 3. Abilities
Desk step one portrays the brand new frequency of each of the risks of the study, depending on the standard of severity discovered. On the other hand, they reveals this new evaluations amongst the distributions away from children for the more threats. Complete, the participants whom exhibited no problem varied anywhere between % that has no problems having difficult Websites use or more to 83.4% who’d no problems having on the web grooming. We note that all of the average and you will severe trouble varied between cuatro% having sexting and you will 17% getting tricky Internet sites explore. 9% out of average/serious troubles along with cyberbullying, it achieved thirteen.7%. The new wavelengths based in the various other degrees of trouble were always deeper for females compared to people.
Desk 1
Prevalence of any of risks because the a purpose of the newest seriousness of one’s disease to the full decide to try as well as intercourse.
In this regard, significant differences were also found between boys and girls in the mean total scores of cyberbullying victimization (Welch’s t = ?2.02, p < 0.043, d = 0.07), online grooming (Welch's t = ?3.51, p < 0.001, d = 0.12) and problematic Internet use (Welch's t = ?2.07, p < 0.039, d = 0.07). In these cases, the mean scores were higher for girls than for boys. There were no significant differences in the rest of the risks: cyber dating abuse victimization (Welch's t = ?1.9, p < 0.058, d = 0.12) and sexting (Welch's t = 0.94, p < 0.410, d = 0.03).
Regarding the type of school (private and public), significant differences were only found in the risks of online grooming (t = ?3.37, p < 0.001, d = 0.13) and sexting (t = 3.8, p < 0.001, d = 0.15). The mean scores were higher in public schools than in private schools in both cases.
In terms of the educational stage (1st–2nd grade of CSE, 3rd–4th grade of CSE and Post-secondary Education), statistically significant differences were found for the risks of cyberbullying victimization (p < 0.002), online grooming (p < 0.001), sexting (p < 0.001) and problematic Internet use (p < 0.001). The scores were higher in 3rd–4th grades, except for online grooming victimization, where higher scores were found in Post-secondary Education (see Dining table 2 ).
Table 2
Variations just like the a purpose of informative stage (1st–2nd, 3rd–fourth grades regarding CSE and you can Blog post-second Training) from the threats (n = 3212, with the exception of the way it is of cyber matchmaking punishment that have n = 1061).
Note: M = arithmetic indicate; SD = simple deviation, F = Welch’s-F, p = significance; ? 2 = eta squared.
Table 3 shows the fresh correlations between your some threats. All of them had positive and you will high correlations with each other, with the relationship ranging from cyberbullying victimization and you may cyber relationships victimization status out. Sites threats with a sexual component (on line brushing and you can sexting) have been extremely synchronised. Generally, new correlations have been highest getting guys in the most common of one’s threats, with the exception of the newest matchmaking between cyber matchmaking victimization and you will grooming and you will ranging from challenging Internet play with and you can cyberbullying victimization, online brushing and sexting.
Desk step 3
Note: The correlations for boys are shown below the diagonal and for girls above it. All correlations are significant at p < 0.001. M = arithmetic mean; SD = standard deviation.
Table cuatro gift ideas the new comorbidities among the individuals Internet dangers associated so you can individual interaction (cyberbullying victimization, cyber relationship punishment victimization, sexting and online brushing). Just the members whom complete all the items towards dangers related to victimization (n = 1109) was basically thought (i.elizabeth., removing in the study those who had no partner). Of your own left players, sixty.7% presented at least one of analysed dangers (letter = datingranking.net/tr/luxy-inceleme/ 674). The risk on the large private frequency are cyberbullying victimization (%), followed closely by on the web grooming. The most prevalent a couple-chance combinations was in fact cyberbullying victimization-online grooming and you may cyberbullying-sexting. We high light the three-chance blend of cyberbullying-sexting-brushing victimization. Fundamentally, 5.49% of one’s victimized teens shown all risks conjointly.